Saturday, February 27, 2016

// // 34 comments

Jews Arguing Vaccines

by Reb Akiva @ Mystical Paths

image

In my last article, “Orthodox Jews and Vaccines”, a number of commentors replied strongly against my position.  Here’s some samples…

- To the statement “30% of children died by age 5”, “I don't believe that is true.   May Hashem have mercy on us all.”

- “Your post is so riddled with inaccuracy and brainwashed talking points…Go to the CDC and just look at the vaccine inserts for each vaccine”.

- “Beyond inaccurate…but too much science disproves your statements.”

- “While vaccines were created to prevent deaths, they have been usurped and redesigned to create illness and death.”

Statistics and data analysis very quickly give us FACTS.  Of course facts are subject to interpretation, and sometimes cause is mixed up with correlation.  But if you’re going to bring arguments against data, bring data…not anecdotal evidence (a few stories).

“I don’t believe that is true”.  It’s normal to believe the stories you hear in synagogue, like “so and so’s baby got a shot and then was sick” over some far away gathered statistics and history, like recent rabbi statements in Israel that the community is suffering an unprecedented number of tragedies as a few young mothers passed away and a few newborns passed away – which everyone heard about, versus the statistics that those same communities have the highest life expectancies in Israel, BUT the data shows that the stories going around are indeed much more rare than 10 years ago, 30 years ago, 50 years ago, and 100 years ago.  Indeed child mortality rates 120 years ago were HORRIBLE, and nowadays the numbers are 1000 times lower…THANK G-D and modern medicine and modern sanitation and modern water systems and modern food processing.

“Go to the CDC and look at the inserts for vaccines”… Years ago I wrote one of the first drug interaction and side effect checking and reporting programs.  The average medicine has around 100 side effects, interactions and bad reactions, many of them life threatening.  One of the most dangerous drugs in the Western World is Tylenol / Paracetamol / acetaminophen / Acemol, the #1 over the counter pain and fever reliever.

In the U.S., 1,567 people, often children, DIED from taking TYLENOL over the last 10 years, with an average of 150 people, often children, dying PER YEAR from TYLENOL.

In the U.S., 122 people (mostly children), died from vaccines…out of 33,000,000 children vaccinated.

FACT – More children die from being given TYLENOL than from being vaccinated.  (Sources – CDC, Politfact, Punditfact)

One will find a similar number of deaths and reactions from normal antibiotics as well.  Yet few people avoid antibiotics or fever reducers due to possible death – when these things have HIGHER death rates than vaccines.

“Too much science disproves your statements.”

A frequent anti-vaccine claim is that autism is caused by vaccination.  And autism is truly a terrifying concern, having DOUBLED from the year 2000-2010 (statistics from the U.S.), going from 1 in 150 children to 1 in 68 children.  It’s similarly increased within the Jewish religious community as well.

But have vaccine rates changed from the year 2000 to 2010?  From my review (of CDC recommended vaccination schedules), the answer seems to be the addition of 2 – rotovirus and varicella (chicken pox).  On the other hand, there is a clear statistical increase in autism with older aged mothers…and an even higher risk with older age FATHERS – and a corresponding increase in older age of mother at birth in the U.S.  (can we safely assume older age couples?)

image

First birth rates for women aged 35–39 started to increase in the mid-1970s and rose six-fold from 1973 to 2006.

First birth rates for women aged 40–44 were …increased more than four-fold from 1985 through 2012.

…science is showing clear ties being other risk factors , such as FATHER’s age, to autism.

“While vaccines were created to prevent deaths, they have been usurped and redesigned to create illness and death.”

Research continues to surprise.  For example, it is now understood that 70% of cervical cancer, a major killer of women, is caused by a VIRUS.  So they created a vaccine against it.  Take the vaccine, eliminate 70% of cervical cancer…and the disease known as genital warts.

Besides that, with people living longer than ever and healthier than ever into older ages, I’m not sure what you mean by “redesigned to create illness and death”.  The statistics seem to show the opposite, they save lives…at a small statistical cost which is lower than the death rate from over the counter medicine.  (That doesn’t mean that any death caused by a vaccine or medicine reaction is not a tragedy.)

There is a general point here.  EVERY medicine, shot, vaccine, even vitamin, has a risk of a negative reaction…up to and including DEATH.  Every time a tylenol or advil is given, any time an antibiotic is taken, any time any human is exposed to a new medicine, chemical, or shot, there is a real risk of a bad reaction.  Not to mention other side effects.  Rare is the person taking 3 or more medication who is NOT having some side effects.  Therefore, one should always weight the risk of bad effects against the value of taking the medicine / shot / vaccine.

But the negative history of most childhood diseases is SO high with risk of death or permanent disability that my analysis is it’s worth the risk.  (Exception – the chicken pox vaccine.)  Therefore I choose vaccination, I chose for my children, and I generally recommend it.

Now if someone wants to point me towards some DATA that shows the negative outcomes of vaccines are reaching even 1% of the historical negative outcomes of the diseases they prevent, I’d be interested in that argument.

Just to belabor the point, in 2013, there were 184 child deaths in CARS in the U.S. from just SITTING in the car, almost 50% more than vaccines.   (Non-traffic fatalities including heat stroke, falling from car, and strangulation by power window.)  [There were 32,000 traffic fatalities in the US in the same year, 90% in the car, 10% being hit by the car.]  So why do we continue to allow this very deadly form of travel???  Especially for children?

Risk versus reward.  We accept the 10 per 100,000 people DYING by car for the societal and personal value it provides.  And we accept the 1 per 270,000 children dying by vaccine for the societal and personal value it provides.

34 comments:

Anonymous said...

Trouble is the typical person believes everything they think is science (which is always evolutionary - finding out last year's facts were wrong) and people tend to believe everything they read and everything governments throws at them. The masses are gullible (Oilem Hagoilem). We live in an era where people must do their own personal research and do what they think is best for them and theirs. You can only believe in H'; everything else is arbitrary. We must not forget the pharmaceutical are making a fortune on medications, vaccines so those who don't trust easily are wiser.

shoshana said...

Anonymous-You said it so well I won't need to say the same. Wise words by which I myself abide and urge my children to do so as well. It's all well and good until you or your child or someone you love is killed or injured from vaccination .

Akiva said...

Shoshana, do you know anyone who has been injured or killed by a car? Do you continue to use them?

Freakenomics does a great job of showing how bad humans are at managing a danger bias. Of course we relate to the story of someone injured or killed more than we relate to statistics, because stories are an inherent pattern by which humans learn.

Example: How many people died in your city from crime versus how many died from the flu? Which are you more frightened of?

Anonymous said...

This article basically sums ups all the arguments from the both sides http://www.breslev.co.il/articles/family/health_and_fitness/the_truth_about_vaccines.aspx?id=22286&language=english.

Those are my 2 cents:
The real reason Holistic Doctors are being killed and vanishing!
affiliated with the GcMAF studies as well as exposing the Napalase poisoning of people. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cALgIHETMDU



[link to www.healthnutnews.com]

Anonymous said...

I think it's normal and healthy and very orthodox to challenge the information provided, to question the system and even the medical system.

When we close our eyes and accept then that's where the danger seeps in. IMHO

(My position in the matter is not for our against.)

Anonymous said...

How much did the pharma mafia pay you for writing this stupid vaccine pusher propaganda ?

Anonymous said...

By writing this super stupid and very dangerous propaganda you've just totaly lost all the credibility of this blog. It is so much disappointing, beyond any words to express !!! I personally would never, bli neder, ever read this blog again, after this !!! All the best.

Akiva said...

Your shouting is propaganda...the article is data. Please, if it's wrong, refute it with better DATA, FACTS, real information. Show that it's misinformed, not credible. Just to shout "Super stupid" is..stupid.

Anonymous said...

There is a really huge amount of information available as printed books and also in internet by very professional scientists, which prove the mortal danger of these poisonous vaccines. You are free to make your own research, but please BEFORE writing this VERY DANGEROUS propaganda as in your article! I expressed my opinion in such strong terms, because it is all about health and even lives of many many Jews who are damaged by these poisonous vaccines beyond repair. Somebody have to write STRONGLY against your misguided article, in order to try to save lives of Jews. It is about DINEI NEFASHOT here and not about your personal kavod or about who is stupid or not !!!

Yakov Butterfield said...

There are 3 factors with the historical data on Deaths.
1) Poor Sanitation (Poor source of clean water/removal of the source of the disease namely human waste) This is still a Problem everywhere
2) Poor Nutrition The Modern Standard American Diet is a real killer and it is being exported throughout the world. When you combine the poor sanitation with poor diet the body has no capacity to fight what is attacking it. The Body needs a variety of whole foods like fruits and vegetables and unprocessed grains.The body needs a balance and time to recover. Just giving a "magic shot" or Silver Bullet will not do it.
3) Stress most of the killer epidemics were either after a war or from the stress on factory processing of animals in conditions that are inhumane and unhealthy to both humans and animals. for example Bird Flu from chickens in factory farms.

Anonymous said...

http://www.naturalnews.com/050582_nagalase_GcMAF_cancer_industry_profits.html#

REVEALED: Cancer industry profits 'locked in' by nagalase molecule injected into humans via vaccines... spurs tumor growth... explains aggressive vaccine push

.......

Doctors found dead and/or went missing felt that nagalase was being introduced to the body through vaccines

"What ends up happening is when the GC protein cannot be converted to McGAF, the entire immune system is compromised."

Some of the doctors who wound up dead or missing believed that the nagalase protein/enzyme was being introduced intentionally into the body either virally or directly through vaccines.

"This is such incredibly damning information to the entire medical profession and the immunological profession and those folks that [sic] are producing immunizations, that apparently they didn't want these guys around," Dr. Broer said.

"I'm not saying what happened to these guys, I'm just saying they're not on this planet anymore."

Doctor compares cancer-causing nagalase to stealth bomber

Nagalese blocks the GC protein from attaching itself to vitamin D, thus preventing the immune system from doing its job and therefore causing cancer and other serious diseases. Without an active immune system, cancer and viral infections can spread rapidly.

Remarkably, there's a significant amount of research available on nagalase and the GcMAF protein. Citing a chapter from The GcMAF Book by Dr. Tim Smith, MD, Dr. Broer said:

Nagalase is like a stealth bomber, the nagalase enzyme synthesized in or released from cancer cells or a virus particle pinpoints the GcMAF protein facilities on the surface of your T and B lymphocytes and simply wipes them out with an incredibly precise bomb.

How precise? Nagalase locates and attacks one specific two-electron bond located only at the 420th amino acid position on a huge protein molecule, one of tens of thousands of proteins, each containing millions of electrons.

This is like selectively taking out a park bench in a major city from 6,000 miles away. More astonishingly, if that is possible, nagalase never misses its target, so there is no collateral damage.

Nagalase is being found in super high concentrations in autistic children

Dr. Bradstreet and his colleagues also learned that the nagalase protein was not present in children at birth but was somehow introduced into autistic children, they felt, during the immunization process.

Before his death, Dr. Bradstreet treated 1,100 patients with GcMAF with an 85 percent response rate – something that was deemed impossible by the medical community.

After reintroducing GcMAF (which had been blocked by nagalase), 15 percent of Bradstreet's autistic patients were no longer autistic, as all of their symptoms were completely eradicated.

Since 1990, 59 research papers have been published on the healing effects of GcMAF, 20 of which pertain to the treatment of cancer. Research suggests that GcMAF can also cure or effectively treat Parkinson's and Alzheimer's disease and rheumatoid arthritis, as well as reduce cancerous breast, prostrate and kidney tumors.



Anonymous said...

http://www.naturalnews.com/037653_vaccine_additives_thimerosal_formaldehyde.html

What's really in vaccines? Proof of MSG, formaldehyde, aluminum and mercury

• Aluminum - A light metal that causes dementia and Alzheimer's disease.

• Antibiotics - Chemicals that promote superbugs, which are deadly antibiotic-resistant strains of bacteria that are killing tens of thousands of Americans every year.

• Formaldehyde - A "pickling" chemical used to preserve cadavers. It's highly toxic to the nervous system, causing blindness, brain damage and seizures.

• Monosodium Glutamate (MSG) - A neurotoxic chemical called an "excitotoxin." It causes brain neurons to be overexcited to the point of death. MSG is toxic even when consumed in foods, where it causes migraine headaches and endocrine system damage

• Thimerosal - A methyl mercury compound that causes severe, permanent nervous system damage. Mercury is highly toxic to the brain. You should never touch, swallow or inject mercury at any dose. There is no safe dose of mercury

........

Why doesn't the vaccine industry offer "clean" vaccines free from all toxic additives?

If vaccines are supposed to be good for you, why do they contain so many additives that are BAD for you? You wouldn't want to eat mercury in your tuna fish. You wouldn't want MSG in your sandwich, and you certainly wouldn't want formaldehyde in your soda. So why would you allow yourself to be injected with these deadly substances?

And just as importantly, why wouldn't the vaccine industry offer CLEAN vaccines? Without any brain-damaging additives?

Absurdly, the vaccine industry says these toxic ingredients are intentionally added to vaccines to make them work better! Yes, that's the reason: Mercury makes vaccines work better, they insist. Click here to see a video news report actually claiming mercury makes vaccines work better, granting children "improved behavior and mental performance."

No, I'm not making this up. The mainstream media literally claims that mercury is GOOD for babies. Vitamins might kill you, they say, but mercury is good for you!

But hold on a second: I thought the theory behind vaccines was that weakened viruses would give the immune system a rehearsal so that it would build up antibodies to the real thing. Where does mercury, MSG or formaldehyde fit anywhere in that theory? Does your body benefit in any way from exposure to formaldehyde? Of course not. The very idea is ludicrous.

So are there such things are clean vaccines? I challenge you to try to find one. They simply don't exist for the population at large. Nearly all vaccines for the masses are deliberately formulated with neurotoxic chemicals that have absolutely nothing to do with the science of vaccinations, but everything to do with autism, Alzheimer's disease, early-onset dementia, immune suppression, and the mass dumbing down of brain function.

Vaccines are designed with chemical additives to poison the population, not to protect the population

That's the real purpose of vaccines: Not to "protect children" with any sort of immunity, but to inject the masses with a toxic cocktail of chemicals that cause brain damage and infertility: Mercury, MSG, formaldehyde and aluminum. The whole point of this is to dumb the population down so that nobody has the presence of mind to wake up and start thinking for themselves.

This is precisely why the smartest, most "awake" people still remaining in society today are the very same ones who say NO to vaccines. Only their brains are still intact and operating with some level of awareness.

The system wants you to stay dumbed down, of course. It makes you easier to control.

Anonymous said...

http://www.naturalnews.com/048687_measles_vaccine_data_research_fraud.html

There is no debate: Vaccine data is largely based on research fraud and intimidation of scientists

When pro-vaccine scientists and skeptics claim that they believe what they believe because of "science," it's important to remember that much of what is assumed to be science today is actually pseudoscience for the promulgation of special interests. Concerning vaccines, it continues to come to light that many of the studies and research projects upon which regulators bought into the vaccine agenda were manipulated, faked or otherwise tampered with to push an agenda.

.......

Anonymous said...

http://www.naturalnews.com/048582_vaccines_dangers_flawed_science_immunity.html

Top 3 things that show vaccines are flawed and antiquated

Sometimes we just refuse to see the writing on the wall. It's not because we are bad people, but rather, we just can't stand to allow our ego to be bruised. When this stance is taken, it becomes very difficult to admit any weakness or wrongdoing even though evidence and logic may suggest otherwise.

We have plenty of manufactured evidence on why vaccines work and really need to be forced on anyone who doesn't comply, but have we really looked at other pieces of evidence that may suggest they have outworn their welcome?

It's time to examine the argument that vaccines have had their heyday in the modern developed world, and need to be archived completely.

Flawed research

The mantra of the vaccine industry is that they are proven safe and effective due to their research. The gold standard of research is the double blind, randomized controlled trial (RCT), which means people are split into 2 groups randomly and participants are given the real thing or a placebo. Results are charted as to whom gets better or worse, and there is no bias as no one knows the placebo or intervention group.

How many vaccines have been using this gold standard? NONE. Why? Researchers state that they can't perform an RCT because it would be unethical to not give a child a vaccine because if they die of something that could have been prevented then they are held responsible. Whether this is reasonable or not, it doesn't change the fact that they do not use the proper standards when testing a "medicine" that is later injected into billions of people across the world that could have dire consequences.

So instead of doing this research, they check to see if a person builds antibodies to the antigen that is in the vaccine. If they are built, it's considered safe and effective. However, these studies are rarely done on children younger than 4 years old, so how exactly could they say it's effective for babies?

...

Not solving any problems not already under control

When you care to look at historical charts and numbers, it's plain to see that many of the diseases being vaccinated for were already under control naturally before the vaccine industry butted in to steal all the glory. And the symptoms were not life threatening over 95% of the time, and most recovered with 24-72 hours. It's important to note that this was also at a time where poor living conditions and inadequate nutrition were rampant, which would only add fuel to any outbreak.

...

Nutrition and sanitation trumps vaccines for immunity

The most interesting part about the vaccine debate is the lack of discussion around the lifestyle and living conditions 60 years ago, and those of today. Sanitation, personal hygiene, and nutrition is exponentially better today than it was in the 20's through the 50's, when the spikes in deaths occurred for most of the diseases being vaccinated against. Improvement in all 3 of those areas alone should make many of these diseases as scary as the common cold.

When fully understood, these improvements alone make the modern day vaccination scares and "outbreaks" look ridiculous. After all, when you know how to take care of the only thing that really matters in the case of any communicable disease, you fail to get scared. You're already prepared.






Anonymous said...

http://www.naturalnews.com/048467_vaccine_industry_intelligent_questions_scientific_principles.html

The 21 curious questions we're never allowed to ask about vaccines

What sort of questions are we not allowed to ask? Here are 21 censored questions the obedient, pharma-controlled mainstream media will never dare ask:

Question #1) If measles vaccines confer measles immunity, then why do already-vaccinated children have anything to fear from a measles outbreak?

Question #2) If vaccines work so well, then why did Merck virologists file a False Claims Act with the U.S. government, describing the astonishing scientific fraud of how Merck faked its vaccine results to trick the FDA?

Question #3) If vaccines don't have any links to autism, then why did a top CDC scientist openly confess to the CDC committing scientific fraud by selectively omitting clinical trial data after the fact in order to obscure an existing link between vaccines and autism?

Question #4) If mercury is a neurotoxic chemical (which it is), then why is it still being injected into children and pregnant women via vaccines?

Question #5) If vaccines are so incredibly safe, then why does the vaccine industry need absolute legal immunity from all harm caused by its products?

Question #6) If vaccines work so well to prevent disease, then why do some vaccines openly admit that they can cause the spread of chickenpox?

Question #7) If vaccines are so great for public health, then why do these historical public health charts show nearly all the declines in infectious disease taking place BEFORE vaccines arrived on the scene?

Question #8) If vaccines are perfectly safe, then why did at least 13 people recently die in Italy after being vaccinated?

Question #9) If vaccines are so trustworthy, then why did a pro-vaccine group in Africa recently discover that vaccines being given to young African women were secretly laced with abortion chemicals?

Question #10) If vaccines are backed by solid science, then why do some vaccine inserts openly admit they are backed by no clinical trials?

Question #11) If vaccines are so safe, then why does this vaccine insert admit that the Gardasil vaccine causes "acute respiratory illness"?

Question #12) If vaccines are so safe, then why does this Gardasil insert sheet admit that the vaccine causes "seizure-like activity, headache, fever, nausea and dizziness" and can even cause those injected with the vaccine to lose consciousness and fall, resulting in injury?

Question #13) If vaccines are totally safe, then why do vaccine insert sheets disclose a long list of frightening and bizarre side effects associated with their vaccines?

Question #14) why do they frequently admit there really aren't any studies of the vaccine for the very groups of people who are often injected with it?

Question #15) why do the vaccine insert sheets openly admit most of them have never been tested for safety in pregnant women?

Question #16) why do their own insert sheets readily admit they are manufactured with a cocktail of toxic chemical ingredients

Question #17) why are as many as 97 percent of children struck by infectious disease already vaccinated against that disease?

Question #18) why did this five-year-old girl recently die from the very strain of flu she was just vaccinated against?

Question #19) why was there a total nationwide blackout on the news of the CDC whistleblower admitting vaccines are linked to autism?

Question #20) Why does the CDC falsely claim all vaccines are completely safe and effective when its own website still lists the toxic chemical ingredients used in vaccines?

Question #21) arrest of parents and the breaking up of families of unvaccinated children?

Anonymous said...

http://www.naturalnews.com/048274_vaccination_dangers_adverse_effects_Big_Pharma.html

Ten reasons not to vaccinate

The decision to vaccinate is yours alone, but it is a decision that should not be taken lightly or done under duress or pressure by others. Once vaccinated, the potential side-effects cannot be easily undone, if at all. These include death, sudden infant death syndrome, auto-immune disorders, inflammatory bowel disease, allergies, asthma, ADHD, autism, Guillian-Barre Syndrome and other neurological damage.


1. Vaccines have never been proven safe or effective. Vaccine studies funded by pharmaceutical companies compare vaccine "side-effects" from one vaccine to another. True, scientific, double-blind placebo studies have never been conducted on vaccines to determine their safety. Effectiveness cannot be determined unless one is then knowingly exposed to the disease entity following vaccination. Only antibody production is measured. See How Pharmaceutical Companies Hide the Dangers of Vaccines from Parents.[1]

2. Vaccines do NOT work. They may create a temporary increase in antibodies for a particular disease, but this does not equate to immunity to disease. Vaccines, with all of their toxins and their unnatural way of introducing disease directly into one's blood stream, decrease cellular immunity, which is more critical for one's immune system. Neurologist Russell Blaylock has lectured and written extensively on this subject.

3. The very first vaccine was a disaster. Vaccine safety and effectiveness is a created myth, strongly embedded in Americans' psyche and reinforced by the health care system.

4. Vaccines are highly profitable for pharmaceutical companies and the health care industry. Strong financial incentives exist to continue this practice, not effectiveness. You cannot trust brochures on vaccines provided by pharmaceutical companies because they are corporations with a profit motive. Their objective is NOT to protect health but to sell vaccines.

5. All vaccines contain a number of toxic poisons and chemicals that are linked to serious neurological damage including aluminum, thimerosal (methyl mercury), antibiotics, monosodium glutamate (MSG) and formaldehyde. Other dangerous substances found in vaccines include antifreeze, lead, cadmium, glycerine, acetone, and yeast proteins.

6. Every study comparing unvaccinated to vaccinated children demonstrates that unvaccinated children enjoy far superior health. Unvaccinated children generally do not suffer from upper respiratory illnesses, ear infections, autism, ADHD, asthma, allergies, auto-immune disorders and other diseases, in comparison to those vaccinated.

7. Vaccines cause a host of "chronic, incurable, and life threatening diseases," including autism, asthma, ADHD, auto-immune disorders, Guillain-Barre Syndrome, food allergies and brain damage.[4]

8. The only way to create true life-long immunity to a disease is through natural exposure to the disease in which the body creates true antibodies and immunity on many levels.

9. Vaccines kill infants, children and adults. Strong evidence links vaccines to sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS).[5] More than one hundred previously healthy young women have died as a result of the HPV vaccine.[6] The flu vaccine has been documented as awarding the most money for serious health injuries, including death

10. If you or a loved one suffers from a vaccine injury, pharmaceutical companies and physicians hold no medical liability. In 1986, the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act was formed, eliminating the ability to directly sue pharmaceutical companies or health care practitioners responsible for vaccine injuries.

Anonymous said...


Explosive: The real reason Holistic Doctors are being killed and vanishing!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cALgIHETMDU

Video that connects the dots between Dr. Bradstreet, GcMAF, VACCINES, cancer cures and the suppression of medical science by the U.S. government.


Anonymous said...

REVEALED: Cancer industry profits 'locked in' by nagalase molecule injected into humans via vaccines... spurs tumor growth... explains aggressive vaccine push

http://www.naturalnews.com/050582_nagalase_GcMAF_cancer_industry_profits.html

...

Dr. Bradstreet was working with a naturally occurring compound that may be the single most effective thing in the immune system for killing cancer cells

In an interview on the Hagmann and Hagmann Report, Dr. Ted Broer, an internationally recognized health and nutrition expert also based in Florida, describes how cutting edge Dr. Bradstreet's work was, as well as a discovery he made that very well may have placed him in great danger and could have been the motive for his suspected murder.

The alternative doctors who went missing and/or were killed, were reportedly "interlocked" through Dr. Bradstreet and Dr. Gonzalez's extensive research on autism, and what's causing autism, according to Dr. Broer.

Dr. Gonzalez, a renown holistic cancer treatment pioneer who helped thousands overcome the disease through alternative medicine, died of an apparent heart attack just one month after Dr. Bradstreet's body was discovered floating in a river.

Internationally recognized health and nutrition doctor reveals possible motive for Bradstreet's death

Dr. Broer stated in the interview:

This information I'm about to give you right now is extremely controversial and a bunch of people have exited the planet who were working with it.

This information has been around for awhile. They knew the information they were working with and they were basically being very, very careful, supposedly. And some of them were being accused of using GcMAF, and the FDA apparently raided several of their offices several weeks before they committed suicide or suddenly died.

It's going to sound complicated, but I'm going to break this down for everybody super, super easy tonight. When you first hear these terms they're going to sound weird to you.

GC protein is a protein in the body that's used by macrophages in the body. What it does is, macrophages in the body are the ones that kill cancer cells, they stop cytokines storms and can be involved in cytokines storms, we'll explain all these terms in a few minutes.

After defining GcMAF and how it's formulated, Dr. Broer reiterates that it's "probably the single most effective thing in the immune system to kill cancer cells."

However, what Dr. Bradstreet and his colleagues discovered is that the immune system is being compromised by a compound called "nagalase."

Nagalase is an enzyme/protein that's made by cancer cells and viruses causing immunodeficiency syndromes and has also been linked to autism as well as a "host of other problems," Dr. Broer explains.

Anonymous said...

REVEALED: Cancer industry profits 'locked in' by nagalase molecule injected into humans via vaccines... spurs tumor growth... explains aggressive vaccine push

http://www.naturalnews.com/050582_nagalase_GcMAF_cancer_industry_profits.html

...

Dr. Bradstreet was working with a naturally occurring compound that may be the single most effective thing in the immune system for killing cancer cells

In an interview on the Hagmann and Hagmann Report, Dr. Ted Broer, an internationally recognized health and nutrition expert also based in Florida, describes how cutting edge Dr. Bradstreet's work was, as well as a discovery he made that very well may have placed him in great danger and could have been the motive for his suspected murder.

The alternative doctors who went missing and/or were killed, were reportedly "interlocked" through Dr. Bradstreet and Dr. Gonzalez's extensive research on autism, and what's causing autism, according to Dr. Broer.

Dr. Gonzalez, a renown holistic cancer treatment pioneer who helped thousands overcome the disease through alternative medicine, died of an apparent heart attack just one month after Dr. Bradstreet's body was discovered floating in a river.

Internationally recognized health and nutrition doctor reveals possible motive for Bradstreet's death

Dr. Broer stated in the interview:

This information I'm about to give you right now is extremely controversial and a bunch of people have exited the planet who were working with it.

This information has been around for awhile. They knew the information they were working with and they were basically being very, very careful, supposedly. And some of them were being accused of using GcMAF, and the FDA apparently raided several of their offices several weeks before they committed suicide or suddenly died.

It's going to sound complicated, but I'm going to break this down for everybody super, super easy tonight. When you first hear these terms they're going to sound weird to you.

GC protein is a protein in the body that's used by macrophages in the body. What it does is, macrophages in the body are the ones that kill cancer cells, they stop cytokines storms and can be involved in cytokines storms, we'll explain all these terms in a few minutes.

After defining GcMAF and how it's formulated, Dr. Broer reiterates that it's "probably the single most effective thing in the immune system to kill cancer cells."

However, what Dr. Bradstreet and his colleagues discovered is that the immune system is being compromised by a compound called "nagalase."

Nagalase is an enzyme/protein that's made by cancer cells and viruses causing immunodeficiency syndromes and has also been linked to autism as well as a "host of other problems," Dr. Broer explains.

Anonymous said...

REVEALED: Cancer industry profits 'locked in' by nagalase molecule injected into humans via vaccines... spurs tumor growth... explains aggressive vaccine push

http://www.naturalnews.com/050582_nagalase_GcMAF_cancer_industry_profits.html

...

Doctors found dead and/or went missing felt that nagalase was being introduced to the body through vaccines

"What ends up happening is when the GC protein cannot be converted to McGAF, the entire immune system is compromised."

Some of the doctors who wound up dead or missing believed that the nagalase protein/enzyme was being introduced intentionally into the body either virally or directly through vaccines.

"This is such incredibly damning information to the entire medical profession and the immunological profession and those folks that [sic] are producing immunizations, that apparently they didn't want these guys around," Dr. Broer said.

"I'm not saying what happened to these guys, I'm just saying they're not on this planet anymore."

Doctor compares cancer-causing nagalase to stealth bomber

Nagalese blocks the GC protein from attaching itself to vitamin D, thus preventing the immune system from doing its job and therefore causing cancer and other serious diseases. Without an active immune system, cancer and viral infections can spread rapidly.

Remarkably, there's a significant amount of research available on nagalase and the GcMAF protein. Citing a chapter from The GcMAF Book by Dr. Tim Smith, MD, Dr. Broer said:

Nagalase is like a stealth bomber, the nagalase enzyme synthesized in or released from cancer cells or a virus particle pinpoints the GcMAF protein facilities on the surface of your T and B lymphocytes and simply wipes them out with an incredibly precise bomb.

How precise? Nagalase locates and attacks one specific two-electron bond located only at the 420th amino acid position on a huge protein molecule, one of tens of thousands of proteins, each containing millions of electrons.

This is like selectively taking out a park bench in a major city from 6,000 miles away. More astonishingly, if that is possible, nagalase never misses its target, so there is no collateral damage.

Nagalase is being found in super high concentrations in autistic children

Dr. Bradstreet and his colleagues also learned that the nagalase protein was not present in children at birth but was somehow introduced into autistic children, they felt, during the immunization process.

Before his death, Dr. Bradstreet treated 1,100 patients with GcMAF with an 85 percent response rate – something that was deemed impossible by the medical community.

After reintroducing GcMAF (which had been blocked by nagalase), 15 percent of Bradstreet's autistic patients were no longer autistic, as all of their symptoms were completely eradicated.

Since 1990, 59 research papers have been published on the healing effects of GcMAF, 20 of which pertain to the treatment of cancer. Research suggests that GcMAF can also cure or effectively treat Parkinson's and Alzheimer's disease and rheumatoid arthritis, as well as reduce cancerous breast, prostrate and kidney tumors.

Anonymous said...

Vaccines are designed with chemical additives to poison the population, not to protect the population

That's the real purpose of vaccines: Not to "protect children" with any sort of immunity, but to inject the masses with a toxic cocktail of chemicals that cause brain damage and infertility: Mercury, MSG, formaldehyde and aluminum. The whole point of this is to dumb the population down so that nobody has the presence of mind to wake up and start thinking for themselves.

The system wants you to stay dumbed down, of course. It makes you easier to control.


http://www.naturalnews.com/037653_vaccine_additives_thimerosal_formaldehyde.html

Anonymous said...

This Mr.Akiva Paths has exposed himself as working for the PHARMA MAFIA, as he himself just wrote: "Years ago I wrote one of the first drug interaction and side effect checking and reporting programs." So folks what do you want from him - he is working for the pharma mafia and gets his salary from them! Thats why he has to write this propaganda. Either he is directly payed for it, or he is so brainwashed, that he honestly believes all that nonsence he writes. As always the solution is to FOLLOW THE MONEY !

Gary said...

This is closer to the point.

http://www.psypost.org/2016/02/narcissism-and-low-self-esteem-predict-conspiracy-beliefs-41253

Anonymous said...

BILL GATES SAID VACCINES COULD BE USED TO LOWER THE WORLD'S POPULATON

Bill Gates’ quote about reducing the world s population by 10 to 15% “if we do a really great job” by using new vaccines and other medical devices has been included by Infowars in the most evil quotes from Bilderberg insiders.

“The world today has 6.8 billion people. That’s heading up to about nine billion. Now if we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care & reproductive health services, we could LOWER that by perhaps 10 or 15 percent.” ― Bill Gates, TED conference presentation.

See the following video at 2:35 mark where Bill Gates speaks these words:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lc-20VK9TbA

How on earth could the "health protecting" vaccines be helpful in REDUCING POPULATION, if they are not in reality a soft kill agent used to slowly MURDER people.



Anonymous said...

YOU HAVE TO READ THIS! Totally incriminating; "REMEMBER ALL THOSE MURDERED MICROBIOLOGISTS (VACCINE EXPERTS) AND THE F.B.I. IGNORING THE OBVIOUS PATTERN OF SERIAL KILLINGS?"

http://israeltruthtimes.blogspot.de/2009/08/you-have-to-read-this-totally.html

Dr. Mark Randall is the pseudonym of a vaccine researcher who worked for many years in the labs of major pharmaceutical houses and the US government's National Institutes of Health.

Retired Vaccine Researcher (Microbiologist) to Jon Rappoport:
"If I had a child now, the last thing I would allow is vaccination."
[Editor's Note: This interview was posted by Jon Rappoport in early January 2002. You will discover by reading it that the very issues we now face of FORCED vaccination of a laboratory-created vaccine to "protect" us against a laboratory-created "disease" (Swine Flu, Bird flu, etc.) was set into motion a long time ago. The vaccine researcher quoted here flat out says that the World Homicide Organization, WHO, is driven by a DEPOPULATION agenda, and that many African leaders know full well that the explosive spread of HIV and AIDS in Africa was caused by WHO-sponsored vaccinations of the 1970s. This former pharmaceutical insider also debunks the widespread ASSUMPTIONS of vaccine "safety" promoted by orthodox medicine, the CDC, the National Institute of Health, state health departments, and their compliant media propagandists who are all parroting SUPERSTITIONS, rather than FACTS. ..Ken Adachi]

From Jon Rappoport (www.nomorefakenews.com)
January 2002

Jon Rappoport a Retired Vaccine Researcher (concealing his identity with the false name "Dr. Mark Randall")

Q (Rappoport): You were once certain that vaccines were the hallmark of good medicine.
A ("Dr. Mark Randall"): Yes I was. I helped develop a few vaccines. I won't say which ones.
Q: Why not?
A: I want to preserve my privacy.
Q: So you think you could have problems if you came out into the open?
A: I believe I could lose my pension.
Q: On what grounds?
A: The grounds don't matter. These people have ways of causing you problems, when you were once part of the Club. I know one or two people who were put under surveillance, who were harassed.
Q: Harassed by whom?
A: The FBI.
Q: Really?
A: Sure. The FBI used other pretexts. And the IRS can come calling too.
Q: So much for free speech.
A: I was "part of the inner circle." If now I began to name names and make specific accusations against researchers, I could be in a world of trouble.
Q: What is at the bottom of these efforts at harassment?
A: Vaccines are the last defense of modern medicine. Vaccines are the ultimate justification for the overall "brilliance" of modern medicine.
Q: Do you believe that people should be allowed to choose whether they should get vaccines?
A: On a political level, yes. On a scientific level, people need information, so that they can choose well. It's one thing to say choice is good. But if the atmosphere is full of lies, how can you choose? Also, if the FDA were run by honorable people, these vaccines would not be granted licenses. They would be investigated to within an inch of their lives.
Q: There are medical historians who state that the overall decline of illnesses was not due to vaccines.
A: I know. For a long time, I ignored their work.

Anonymous said...

Q: Let me get this straight. These are all contaminants which don't belong in the vaccines.
A: That's right. And if you try to calculate what damage these contaminants can cause, well, we don't really know, because no testing has been done, or very little testing. It's a game of roulette. You take your chances. Also, most people don't know that some polio vaccines, adenovirus vaccines, rubella and hep A and measles vaccines have been made with aborted human fetal tissue. I have found what I believed were bacterial fragments and poliovirus in these vaccines from time to time -- which may have come from that fetal tissue. When you look for contaminants in vaccines, you can come up with material that IS puzzling. You know it shouldn't be there, but you don't know exactly what you've got. I have found what I believed was a very small "fragment" of human hair and also human mucus. I have found what can only be called "foreign protein," which could mean almost anything. It could mean protein from viruses.
Q: Alarm bells are ringing all over the place.
A: How do you think I felt? Remember, this material is going into the bloodstream without passing through some of the ordinary immune defenses.
Q: How were your findings received?
A: Basically, it was, don't worry, this can't be helped. In making vaccines, you use various animals' tissue, and that's where this kind of contamination enters in. Of course, I'm not even mentioning the standard chemicals like formaldehyde, mercury, and aluminum which are purposely put into vaccines.
Q: This information is pretty staggering.
A: Yes. And I'm just mentioning some of the biological contaminants. Who knows how many others there are? Others we don't find because we don't think to look for them. If tissue from, say, a bird is used to make a vaccine, how many possible germs can be in that tissue? We have no idea. We have no idea what they might be, or what effects they could have on humans.

Q: And beyond the purity issue?
A: You are dealing with the basic faulty premise about vaccines. That they intricately stimulate the immune system to create the conditions for immunity from disease. That is the bad premise. It doesn't work that way. A vaccine is supposed to "create" antibodies which, indirectly, offer protection against disease. However, the immune system is much larger and more involved than antibodies and their related "killer cells."
Q: The immune system is?
A: The entire body, really. Plus the mind. It's all immune system, you might say. That is why you can have, in the middle of an epidemic, those individuals who remain healthy.
Q: So the level of general health is important.
A: More than important. Vital.
Q: How are vaccine statistics falsely presented?
A: There are many ways. For example, suppose that 25 people who have received the hepatitis B vaccine come down with hepatitis. Well, hep B is a liver disease. But you can call liver disease many things. You can change the diagnosis. Then, you've concealed the root cause of the problem.
Q: And that happens?
A: All the time. It HAS to happen, if the doctors automatically assume that people who get vaccines DO NOT come down with the diseases they are now supposed to be protected from. And that is exactly what doctors assume. You see, it's circular reasoning. It's a closed system. It admits no fault. No possible fault. If a person who gets a vaccine against hepatitis gets hepatitis, or gets some other disease, the automatic assumption is, this had nothing to do with the disease.

Q: In your years working in the vaccine establishment, how many doctors did you encounter who admitted that vaccines were a problem?
A: None. There were a few who privately questioned what they were doing. But they would never go public, even within their companies.
Q: What was the turning point for you?
A: I had a friend whose baby died after a DPT shot.

Anonymous said...


Q: Is there any way to compare the relative frequency of these different outcomes?
A: No. Because the follow-up is poor. We can only guess. If you ask, out of a population of a hundred thousand children who get a measles vaccine, how many get the measles, and how many develop other problems from the vaccine, there is a no reliable answer. That is what I'm saying. Vaccines are superstitions. And with superstitions, you don't get facts you can use. You only get stories, most of which are designed to enforce the superstition. But, from many vaccine campaigns, we can piece together a narrative that does reveal some very disturbing things. People have been harmed. The harm is real, and it can be deep and it can mean death. The harm is NOT limited to a few cases, as we have been led to believe.In the US, there are groups of mothers who are testifying about autism and childhood vaccines. They are coming forward and standing up at meetings.They are essentially trying to fill in the gap that has been created by the researchers and doctors who turn their backs on the whole thing.
Q: Let me ask you this. If you took a child in, say, Boston and you raised that child with good nutritious food and he exercised every day and he was loved by his parents, and he didn't get the measles vaccine, what would be his health status compared with the average child in Boston who eats poorly and watches five hours of TV a day and gets the measles vaccine?
A: Of course there are many factors involved, but I would bet on the better health status for the first child. If he gets measles, if he gets it when he is nine, the chances are it will be much lighter than the measles the second child might get. I would bet on the first child every time.
Q: How long did you work with vaccines?
A: A long time. Longer than ten years.
Q: Looking back now, can you recall any good reason to say that vaccines are successful?
A: No, I can't. If I had a child now, the last thing I would allow is vaccination. I would move out of the state if I had to. I would change the family name. I would disappear. With my family. I'm not saying it would come to that. There are ways to sidestep the system with grace, if you know how to act. There are exemptions you can declare, in every state, based on religious and/or philosophic views. But if push came to shove, I would go on the move.
Q: And yet there are children everywhere who do get vaccines and appear to be healthy.
A: The operative word is "appear." What about all the children who can't focus on their studies? What about the children who have tantrums from time to time? What about the children who are not quite in possession of all their mental faculties? I know there are many causes for these things, but vaccines are one cause. I would not take the chance. I see no reason to take the chance. And frankly, I see no reason to allow the government to have the last word. Government medicine is, from my experience, often a contradiction in terms. You get one or the other, but not both.
Q: So we come to the level playing field.
A: Yes. Allow those who want the vaccines to take them. Allow the dissidents to decline to take them. But, as I said earlier, there is no level playing field if the field is strewn with lies. And when babies are involved, you have parents making all the decisions. Those parents need a heavy dose of truth. What about the child I spoke of who died from the DPT shot? What information did his parents act on? I can tell you it was heavily weighted. It was not real information.
Q: Medical PR people, in concert with the press, scare the hell out of parents with dire scenarios about what will happen if their kids don't get shots.
A: They make it seem a crime to refuse the vaccine. They equate it with bad parenting. You fight that with better information. It is always a challenge to buck the authorities. And only you can decide whether to do it. It is every person's responsibility to make up his mind. The medical cartel likes that bet. It is betting that the fear will win.

Anonymous said...

A Trail of Dead Microbiologists (Vaccine Specialists)

http://israeltruthtimes.blogspot.de/2009/08/you-have-to-read-this-totally.html

Nov. 12, 2001 - Benito Que was said to have been beaten in a Miami parking lot and died later.

Nov. 16, 2001 - Don C. Wiley went missing. Was found

Dec. 20. Investigators said he got dizzy on a Memphis bridge and fell to his
death in a river.

Nov. 21, 2001 - Vladimir Pasechnik, former high-level Russian microbiologist who defected in 1989 to the U.K. apparently died from a stroke.

Nov 24, 2001 - A Swissair flight from Berlin to Zurich crashes during its landing approach; 22 are killed and nine survive. Among those killed are Dr. Yaakov Matzner, 54, dean of the Hebrew University school of medicine; Amiramp Eldor, 59, head of the haematology department at Ichilov Hospital in Tel Aviv and a world-recognized expert in blood clotting; and Avishai Berkman, 50, director of the Tel Aviv public health department and businessman.

Dec. 10, 2001 - Robert M. Schwartz was stabbed to death in Leesberg, Va. Three Satanists have been arrested. Dec. 14, 2001 - Nguyen Van Set died in an airlock filled with nitrogen in his lab in Geelong, Australia.

Feb. 9, 2002 - Victor Korshunov had his head bashed in near his home in Moscow.

Feb. 14, 2002 - Ian Langford was found partially naked and wedged under a chair in Norwich, England.

Feb. 28, 2002 - San Francisco resident Tanya Holzmayer was killed by a microbiologist colleague, Guyang Huang, who shot her as she took delivery of a pizza and then apparently shot himself.

March 24, 2002 - David Wynn-Williams died in a road accident near his home in Cambridge, England.

March 25, 2002 - Steven Mostow of the Colorado Health Sciences Centre, killed in a plane he was flying near Denver.

June 24, 2003 - Leland Rickman, Associate Clinical Professor of Medicine at the UCSD School of Medicine, died suddenly on June 24 while traveling and teaching medicine in Lesotho, Africa. Actual cause of death, apparently due to natural causes, is not known.

July 18, 2003 - David Kelly, a British biological weapons expert, was said to have slashed his own wrists while walking near his home. Kelly was the Ministry of Defence's chief scientific officer and senior adviser to the proliferation and arms control secretariat, and to the Foreign Office's non-proliferation department. The senior adviser on biological weapons to the UN biological weapons inspections teams (Unscom) from 1994 to 1999, he was also, in the opinion of his peers, pre-eminent in his field, not only in this country, but in the world.

November 20, 2003 - Robert Leslie Burghoff, 45, a postdoctoral fellow at Baylor College of Medicine's molecular virology and microbiology department, was walking to his car Nov. 20 when he was hit from behind by a white or light-colored cargo van that jumped the sidewalk in the 1600 block of South Braeswood. Burghoff, a father of three who lived in The Woodlands, had been studying the Norwalk virus plaguing cruise ships.

Anonymous said...

The mysterious deaths of top microbiologists (Vaccine Specialists)

http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/deadbiologists.html?q=deadbiologists.html

It all began with Don Wiley. On November 15th, Harvard Professor Don Wiley left a gathering of friends and colleagues some time after 10:30 PM. The next morning, Memphis police found his rental car stopped on a bridge, with a full tank of gas and keys still in the ignition. There was no financial or family trouble. Indeed Wiley was supposed to meet his family at the Memphis airport to continue on to an Icelandic vacation. Neither was there any history of depression or mental illness.
In the report printed in the New York Times on November 27th, the FBI's Memphis office distanced itself from the case saying that the available facts did not add up to a suspicion of foul play. I guess at the FBI it's a perfectly everyday occurrence for a Harvard Professor to stop his rental car on a bridge in the middle of the night before he is supposed to leave for Iceland and just walk away into the Tennessee dark.
The NYT report of November 27th also downplayed Professor Wiley's expertise in virology, quoting Gregory Verdine, a professor of chemical biology at Harvard, said, "If bioterrorists were to abduct Don Wiley, they'd be very disappointed," because his research was in studying the component parts of viruses, and "that doesn't really help you make a more dangerous version of the virus."
But this statement is not consistent with the facts of Professor Wiley's full range of knowledge. Wiley has, in conjunction with another Harvard Professor, Dr. Jack Strominger, won several academic prizes for their work in immunology, including a Lasker prize. Don Wiley is a Harvard professor, but he is also a researcher at the Howard Hughes Medical Institute, and the National Institute of Health. The Howard Hughes Medical Institute is located in Chevy Chase, Maryland, and performs biological research, sometimes jointly funded by the Department of Defense and the NIH. Don Wiley's peers at Harvard include professors such as John Collier performing research on Anthrax.
So, contrary to the dismissive tone of the New York Times report, Professor Wiley would be of great value to anyone developing biological weapons. This makes the FBI's obvious disinterest in the case highly questionable, indeed reminiscent of the FBI's obvious disinterest in the numerous witnesses in Oklahoma City who had seen Tim McVeigh in the company of additional perpetrators not to mention the witnesses who had seen additional bombs.
Especially in light of the events of 9/11, the vanishing of a scientist with Professor Wiley's expertise in virology and immunology should have been expected to be an issue of critical national importance, yet the official tone of the government was that this is nothing to worry about. Move along citizen, nothing to see.
In the context of the Anthrax letters being sent through the mail, any disappearance of any microbiologist under questionable circumstances should have set off alarm bells across the nation. but it didn't. Professor Wiley was assumed to have committed suicide, end of story.
The professor's colleagues expressed doubts about the official "suicide" explanation for his disappearance.

Anonymous said...

.....

Then, more biologists started to die under suspicious circumstances.
The Very Mysterious Deaths of Five Microbiologists.
The body count of infections disease experts continued to climb. Connections to weapons research began to surface.
As many as 14 world-class microbiologists died between 9/11/1 and 3/2/2, and on 6/24/2 yet another microbiologist was added to the list.
Still the US Government acted as if nothing was amiss, as silent on the question of dead microbiologists as they are on the question of the Israeli spies and their connection to 9-11.
In fact, the official silence on the question of how so many top experts in infectious diseases could die in such a short time span is deafening.
Now, statistically, it's possible, even likely, that one or two of these microbiologists legitimately were killed in random accidents. But for so many to die in such a short while exceeds all reasonable bounds of statistics. Prudence would demand an investigation, not the "ho hum" attitude of the government which even today continues to issue dire warnings to the general population of how much we are all in danger from "bioterrorism".
So, let's take a moment and step away from the perpetual fear-mongering of the media (and Rumsfeld) as they assure us another attack IS coming (with a certainty which suggests inside information on the subject) and assume for a moment that some party has indeed decided to "liquidate" weapons research infectious disease experts.
There is really only one reason to kill off a bunch of scientists. To keep them from doing something they are able to do.
What were these scientists able to do? Maybe blow the whistle if an artificially created disease was about to beused in a manner those who created it did not approve of.
Regardless of the exact reason, there does seem to be a clear pattern of targeted microbiologists, and paired with it, an obvious government disinterest in the matter.
I leave it to you to figure out why.

Anonymous said...

Of course a plane FULL of Israeli microbiologists downed over the Black Sea in 2001 gets no attention.

http://israeltruthtimes.blogspot.de/2009/08/you-have-to-read-this-totally.html

"Israeli biological and nuclear scientists are being knocked off one by one and this covert war is going unnoticed. A plane carrying scientists to Russia's biological warfare center at Novosibirsk was blown up over the Black Sea and no one questions that the Ukrainian missile that supposedly did the job was a hundred miles out of range. Then a Swissair Corsair crashes killing the head of Ichilov Hospital's Hematology department, as well as directors of the Hebrew University School Of Medicine and the Tel Aviv Public Health Department and not a word of suspicion is raised. After that, one of the country's most prominent nuclear scientists, Baruch Zinger is assassinated and still, no one is putting the pieces together. Your front line against nuclear and biological attacks is being picked off in a covert murder campaign and your government is taking no security precautions to stop the intellectual slaughter. Or if it is, your public is totally unaware of the daily danger to its most educated citizens."

Akiva said...

"Mr. Gates thinks that vaccines and better healthcare have the net effect of reducing population growth BECAUSE people have fewer children when they expect them to survive.

This is supported by data linking increasing health with a decrease in birth rate. The most dramatic demonstration of this is in many European countries where standard of living is high and population growth has dropped....

So by increasing worldwide health using vaccination and healthcare, and providing access to contraception, we can in the long term decrease population growth."

Anonymous said...

Q: If vaccines actually do harm, why are they given?

A: First of all, there is no "if." They do harm. It becomes a more difficult question to decide whether they do harm in those people who seem to show no harm. Then you are dealing with the kind of research which should be done, but isn't. Researchers should be probing to discover a kind of map, or flow chart, which shows exactly what vaccines do in the body from the moment they enter. This research has not been done. As to why they are given, we could sit here for two days and discuss all the reasons. As you've said many times, at different layers of the system people have their motives. Money, fear of losing a job, the desire to win brownie points, prestige, awards, promotion, misguided idealism, unthinking habit, and so on. But, at the highest levels of the medical cartel, vaccines are a top priority because they cause a weakening of the immune system. I know that may be hard to accept, but it's true. The medical cartel, at the highest level, is not out to help people, it is out to harm them, to weaken them. To kill them. At one point in my career, I had a long conversation with a man who occupied a high government position in an African nation. He told me that he was well aware of this. He told me that WHO is a front for these depopulation interests. There is an underground, shall we say, in Africa, made up of various officials who are earnestly trying to change the lot of the poor. This network of people knows what is going on. They know that vaccines have been used, and are being used, to destroy their countries, to make them ripe for takeover by globalist powers. I have had the opportunity to speak with several of these people from this network.

Read the whole interview with this vaccine insider turned dissident here:
http://israeltruthtimes.blogspot.de/2009/08/you-have-to-read-this-totally.html

Anonymous said...

Q: If vaccines actually do harm, why are they given?

A: First of all, there is no "if." They do harm. It becomes a more difficult question to decide whether they do harm in those people who seem to show no harm. Then you are dealing with the kind of research which should be done, but isn't. Researchers should be probing to discover a kind of map, or flow chart, which shows exactly what vaccines do in the body from the moment they enter. This research has not been done. As to why they are given, we could sit here for two days and discuss all the reasons. As you've said many times, at different layers of the system people have their motives. Money, fear of losing a job, the desire to win brownie points, prestige, awards, promotion, misguided idealism, unthinking habit, and so on. But, at the highest levels of the medical cartel, vaccines are a top priority because they cause a weakening of the immune system. I know that may be hard to accept, but it's true. The medical cartel, at the highest level, is not out to help people, it is out to harm them, to weaken them. To kill them. At one point in my career, I had a long conversation with a man who occupied a high government position in an African nation. He told me that he was well aware of this. He told me that WHO is a front for these depopulation interests. There is an underground, shall we say, in Africa, made up of various officials who are earnestly trying to change the lot of the poor. This network of people knows what is going on. They know that vaccines have been used, and are being used, to destroy their countries, to make them ripe for takeover by globalist powers. I have had the opportunity to speak with several of these people from this network.

( Read the whole interview with this vaccine insider turned dissident here:
http://israeltruthtimes.blogspot.de/2009/08/you-have-to-read-this-totally.html )

BUT NOT ONLY IN AFRICAN THIRD WORLD COUNTRIES THE VACCINES ARE BEING USED AS A TOOL TO DESTROY THESE COUNTRIES AND MAKE THEM RIPE FOR TAKEOVER BY GLOBALIST POWERS, BUT ALSO H E R E I N I S R A E L THE SAME EVIL POWERS ARE USING THE VACCINE AGENDA TO WEAKEN THE JEWS AND ESPECIALLY THE REAL BELIEVING ORTHODOX JEWS, WHOM THEY HATE MOST AND WHOM THEY WANT TO DESTROY, AND THAT'S WHY THESE EVIL POWERS ARE SO DESPERATELY PUSHING THESE KILLER VACCINES ON THE JEWISH ORTHODOX POPULATION, BUYING OFF SOME CORRUPTED RABBIS AND FOOLING SOME NAIVE RABBIS IN ORDER TO INFLUENCE THE JEWISH ORTHODOX POPULATION TO BELIEVE IN THIS VACCINE SCAM...

DO WE REALLY WANT TO BE A TOOL IN THESE EVIL HANDS OF AMALEK ???

Related Posts with Thumbnails