Sunday, April 27, 2008


Making the News: Going after Politicians for Following the Law

by Akiva at Mystical Paths

A study released about a month ago statistically confirmed what many of us knew, 40% of news reports in Israel aren't news, they're opinion (the reporter is making them up to present his/her position). This is blatently clear from reading websites such as YNetnews or Haaretz.

It gets worse when they specifically go after someone, and if they can't find the merest excuse or example of lawbreaking (such as having spit on the sidewalk once 10 years ago), they'll try to make one up. This was recently the case with Bibi Netanyahu, who they went after for making a trip to London where the accommodations were paid for by the trip sponsor. Besides this not actually being illegal, the trip was requested by the Israeli government and for Israeli PR purposes. And, as anyone who watches Israeli PR knows, Netanyahu is about the only Israeli politician who has the slightest clue how to speak to the Western press. In the end the issue faded because, well, there wasn't actually anything there (beyond the press blowing foul spelling gas).

Today we see the same thing happen in the US. The NY Times has decided to go after Republican presidential candidate John McCain. The accusation, the candidate followed the law, to the letter, in using a corporate jet in his campaign from his wife's company. The Times worked extensively to prove that he followed the law, and didn't pay more than he had to. That, of course, is his failing, he should have gone beyond the letter of the law (per the NY Times). Not that the other candidates are, and we don't actually know because they didn't look at that.

Now, I'd love for the US presidential candidate to be a chossid who goes beyond the letter of the law, and I'd certainly appreciate an Israeli Prime Minister candidate who actually follows the law! (Being many people treat many laws in Israel as mere suggestions or informal guidelines, including the government.) But if I just get politicians that are "only" following the law, frankly I'd be thrilled.

BTW, I am not endorsing John McCain nor Bibi Netanyahu. What I am doing is calling the news media to task for massive and inappropriate opinion manipulation. I look forward to seeing such examinations of candidate Obama or Olmert. (I know, don't hold my breath.)

Support the Path! - Posted at Mystical Paths,


  1. Your post is fine as far as it goes but it simply doesn't go far enough. The two word argument against McCain is "McCain Feinstein" There's lots more. Quite a few GOP stalwarts of my acquaintance have said "no more holding my nose and voting for the lesser of two evils anymore" regarding him (and also Giuliani before he dropped out.

    None of these people would have ever considered voting for any of the Democratic candidates in this or any of the several earlier USA presidential elections.

    This means there is indeed no good, nay no minimally acceptable candidate.

    I agree that the MSM may well be making a tumul over a non issue in this instance but there's much more that needs to be reported about him, and ALSO about the Democrats. cycjec

  2. I forgot to add: One essential issue where all three (BHO, HRC, JMcC) fail is the RKBA (right to keep and bear arms) for more on this see e.g. David Codrea's War on Guns. cycjec


Welcome to Mystical Paths comments. Have your say here, but please keep the tone reasonably civil and avoid lashon hara.

Your comments are governed by our Terms of Use, Privacy, and Comments policies. We reserve the right to delete or edit your comments for any reason, or use them in a future article. That said, YOU are responsible for YOUR comments - not us.

Related Posts with Thumbnails